|
"Patron" and "Matron" Gods |
|
When people
first come to Hellenismos, they are often drawn here by their attraction
to one God, in particular. And who can deny that initial pull, that first
sense of affinity and intimacy with the divine? The modern
world prefers a more compartmentalised perspective, where ‘fact’ and
‘value’ are kept separate for fear they might pollute one another. This
poses some very real problems when attempting to understand, and take part
in, Hellenic spirituality. The modern perspective, which lacks any intrinsic relationship between art and religion, has a more Gnostic vocabulary. We seek direct cause-and-effect relationships. If we feel drawn to a God, then we are ‘called’. Whims become ‘messages’. Dreams become ‘visitations’. And the individual declares the God their ‘patron’. The notion that a God might arbitrarily ‘select’ and ‘tutor’ one individual runs counter to our religion. It is, quite literally, hubristic, and something that would have been frowned upon even in Homer’s time. We are all affected and moved by the Gods, but this happens in a subtle way, and is sometimes only realized in retrospect. It is not that the Gods and Heroes do not speak to us. Rather, the Hellenic view of divine intervention embraces a more nuanced and sophisticated spectrum then the ‘Gnostic’ paradigm of two-way communication. Thomas Harrison writes in his book "Divinity and History: the religion of Herodotus": "Fifth and fourth-century Athenians ... did not see gods popping up here and there." And neither should we.
The Greeks conceived of divine patronage as
being a non-elective, group experience. For instance, Athena is the patron
Goddess of Athens, Hephaistos is the patron God of blacksmiths, and
Demeter is the patron Goddess of the priestly families of Eleusis. The
individual neither 'selects', nor is 'selected'. The Hero is a Hero, not
because a God has 'chosen' them, but because they are perceptive to the
will of the Gods and willing to put it into action. |